BIT Studio

July 1, 2008


Filed under: Composts — webmaster @ 11:13 am

  The superimposition of human characteristics on inanimate objects is called personification.  The character of God, in the compilation of short stories called the Bible, represents personification of the unknown.  By definition, all of religion can be reduced to a simple literary technique.

Providing human behavioral traits to non-human occurrences is a device for improving understanding.  Personifying good and evil creates a format whereby the masses can relate, on a very simplistic level, how and why events occur: Misfortune is due to someone’s disapproval; Success is a result of conforming to someone’s desired behavior; Unexplainable events are attributable to someone’s incredible and mysterious powers.

The Bible uses standard metaphorical techniques to accomplish its message.  The Good Book is a literary work complete with colorful plot line and fictionally believable characters.  The melodramatic activity is enormous and the reader is presented with extreme positions of good and evil leaving no doubt about how one should judge each character’s behavior.  The message is simple; conform or rot in Hell.

God, as personification of the unknown, is an excellent example of the quest for a comprehensive Theory of Everything.  Einstein worked his entire life toward this fundamental idea for simplifying our existence and felt failure in the end as he realized it would not be attained in his lifetime.  When religion provides human characteristics to the unknown, the Big ToE is then simplified into ‘He did it’.  How convenient.  How simple.  How comforting.  How ridiculous.

Religion uses confirming instances (such as those used by Freud) as proof of its existence and ad hoc excuses (such as those found in astrology) as its alibi when expected results fail.  Karl Popper, creator of the falsifiability criteria and main contributor to today’s Philosophy of Science, dismisses both of these practices as inadequate.  The fickleness of human personality allows religion to selectively choose how to justify God’s reaction to everything; sometimes good, sometimes bad, but whatever happens is appropriate and undisputable.

Personification is a powerful literary technique and the Bible may be one of the first published documents to use it successfully.

June 26, 2008


Filed under: Composts — webmaster @ 6:28 pm

  Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) gained notoriety during the late 20th century for his views on compassion and the role of his œbermensch hierarchy in modern society.  As an author, Nietzsche is very accessible.  His 1882 book The Gay Science (politically correct translation being The Joyous Wisdom) is a relatively easy read and contains Nietzsche’s first reference to God is dead. 

In 1883, Nietzsche wrote his self-proclaimed best work, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, which reveals his view of compassion.  Nietzsche’s opinion is that pity is a self-indulgence of the weak and he asserts that where society distinguishes between love and pity, Christianity does not.  Zarathustra (or Zoroaster) is an ancient Iranian prophet and founder of Zoroastrianism, the national religion of the Sassanid Empire of Persia (226-651 CE).  A somewhat mythical figure (his existence is estimated to be between 10000 BCE and 1000 BCE), he was possibly the first Gnostic to utilize ‘revealed’ scripture (i.e. his own revelations).  In Nietzsche’s book, Zarathustra is driven to rise above the final sin of pity.

Nietzsche’s middle period writings are most practical and, although not joyous, he seems hopeful and cautiously skeptical.  The œbermensch or Super Human is a standard which great men are born to achieve and it is this theme of constant self-examination and reverence-for-self that became the center of his life’s work.  Nietzsche despised the weak and felt that concepts such as the meek shall inherit the earth were excuses to do and achieve nothing.  His opinion of nihilism is somewhat confusing as he feels that it is bad for humanity yet necessary and good for the few higher men to rise above and create new suns (sources of value).

Nietzsche may be the most misquoted philosopher of all time.  In spite of his well documented displeasure with German society and a very vocal campaign against anti-Semitism, the Nazi party chose him as their philosophic inspiration.  His famous quote ‘God is dead’ is an over-simplification of his view on the importance of a self-centered existence and is less of a declaration than a comment regarding the liberating effect of independence.  His written displeasure of Richard Wagner downplayed his overwhelming commitment to music and art.  (The musical work Also Sprach Zarathustra by Richard Strauss – later used in Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey – was inspired by Nietzsche.)  A misogynistic introvert, but somewhat less extreme later in life, his writings regarding women are horribly insulting, usually requiring a Henny-Youngman-style rim shot to salvage their awkward delivery.

Although his general philosophy discourages democracy, Nietzsche’s writings on personal self-development (knowledge, creativity, the arts) set standards and goals which many feel a progressive and democratic society can support.

6000 Years

Filed under: Composts — webmaster @ 6:24 pm

  Truth is a matter of perspective involving time, place and available information.

A classic misrepresentation of truth (and time) was the 17th century declaration by Archbishop Ussher of Armagh and his contemporary John Lightfoot.  Based on ‘information found in the bible’, they proclaimed that the earth was created on Saturday October 23, 4004 BCE, at 9:00am.  Ussher used biblical references for time (it rained for 40 days; Jesus lived for 33 years) and stories (October because apples were on the tree; Saturday because it took all week) to establish the date.  Considering that there was little progress in geological sciences until the 18th century and the existence of the dinosaur was not confirmed until the early 19th century, the Archbishop’s enthusiasm can be forgiven.

It is amazing that even today some people quote this declaration as fact, stating that the information is confirmed in the bible.  The successful mass marketing of this bogus story is the result of a person of authority promoting a misinterpreted truth.  This point is important.  The texts of the bible were written in the vernacular of the era with stories pertaining to the established beliefs of the time.  Because it is likely much of the truths derived from the bible are determined with insufficient and/or self-serving information, most interpretations can be considered of questionable merit.

The world’s religions rely heavily on decisions, edicts and interpretations handed down by their leaders.  Fact-challenged data and truth by authority combine to create a powerful marketing campaign.

Knowledge and information will change just as leaders and opinions will change.  As a result, our interpretation of truth requires constant review and a relentless application of reason.  Truth, as well as life, must continually evolve.

May 24, 2008

Eye Coward

Filed under: Composts — webmaster @ 8:47 pm

Presbyopia is a degeneration in the ability to read due to a loss in elasticity of the crystalline lens. Although the actual science is not fully understood, it happens to everyone and typically kicks in around the age of forty. I suffer from it.

I examined laser surgery options and found that they promote “monovision” which sets one eye for distance (the dominant) and one eye for reading, relying on the brain to choose the appropriate eye for cognition. They suggest solving the problem with either invasive surgery (slicing your retina) or non-invasive surgery (bombarding twelve points on your retina with high intensity radio-waves).

I am uncomfortable with committing each eye to just one of either distance or reading. In reality, I am a coward. But I liked the concept of mono-vision and had a pair of glasses made that have clear glass on one side and a 2.0 reading prescription on the other. The obvious benefit is that I still have access to stereo vision by 1) removing my glasses for distance or 2) using inexpensive reading glasses for reading.

Fast forward six months, I am very happy with the results. The glasses are perfect for work providing a seamless connection between reading, writing, computers, menus, meetings, conversations and driving. It takes less than one half hour every day to get completely comfortable with the mono-frames; the initial period is somewhat like viewing the world through 3-D glasses. But the brain adapts quickly and although I still have a prosthetic device sitting on my nose, it is a wonderful compromise.

May 20, 2008

Lighter Shade of Gray

Filed under: Composts — webmaster @ 6:29 am

Gray hair is just the beginning. With middle age comes a graying of opinion, a deviation from the melodramatic, black/white, right/wrong views of youth. An acceptance of disagreement takes over yielding an openness to other’s behaviors and views. Is it experience? Possibly. Is it respect? Maybe. Is it despondence? Likely. But bitching and moaning never solved anything and the gene pool needs creativity as much as it needs conformity. It takes all kinds and there is room for hue too.

« Previous Page

generiert in 1.135 Sekunden. | Powered by WordPress